<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Denoise 1.0 released</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.banana-bee.com/weblog/2008/04/30/denoise-1-0-released/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.banana-bee.com/weblog/2008/04/30/denoise-1-0-released/</link>
	<description>bee banana</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 11:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michal</title>
		<link>http://www.banana-bee.com/weblog/2008/04/30/denoise-1-0-released/#comment-163</link>
		<dc:creator>Michal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 18:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.banana-bee.com/weblog/?p=15#comment-163</guid>
		<description>Thanks for nice words Bill, it's a huge support for me to read it. I hope your sale was not just a result of decaffeination, and that you still enjoy being the customer Nr. 4. For me all sales today were equal enjoyable as the 1st one. Thanks everybody.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for nice words Bill, it&#8217;s a huge support for me to read it. I hope your sale was not just a result of decaffeination, and that you still enjoy being the customer Nr. 4. For me all sales today were equal enjoyable as the 1st one. Thanks everybody.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Fuller</title>
		<link>http://www.banana-bee.com/weblog/2008/04/30/denoise-1-0-released/#comment-162</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Fuller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 16:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.banana-bee.com/weblog/?p=15#comment-162</guid>
		<description>Well, I guess I'm close to the first customer. I too have been unhappy with other noise removers. All of them left my image too soft. I read about Denoise this morning and downloaded the trial and tested it on some images that I really like but were shot way too early in the morning to have decent light. Denoise at its default settings did a better job of removing the noise due to excessively high ISO settings without destroying the image in the process than anything else I've tried. I guess we have the same set of needs.

It's good that it worked well with the default settings, since there are no docs as yet. At any rate, it impressed me enough to buy it after about 30 minutes of testing. I usually test more than that. Either the product is exceptionally good, or you caught me too early in the morning before the coffee kicked in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I guess I&#8217;m close to the first customer. I too have been unhappy with other noise removers. All of them left my image too soft. I read about Denoise this morning and downloaded the trial and tested it on some images that I really like but were shot way too early in the morning to have decent light. Denoise at its default settings did a better job of removing the noise due to excessively high ISO settings without destroying the image in the process than anything else I&#8217;ve tried. I guess we have the same set of needs.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s good that it worked well with the default settings, since there are no docs as yet. At any rate, it impressed me enough to buy it after about 30 minutes of testing. I usually test more than that. Either the product is exceptionally good, or you caught me too early in the morning before the coffee kicked in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
